CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Translatio versus Concessio: Retrieving the Debate about Contracts of Alienation with an Application to Today's Employment Contract Export

Politics Society, Vol. 33, No. 3. (1 September 2005), pp. 449-480.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


haelstaed's tags for this article

alienation employment_contract voluntary_slavery work_contract

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Liberalism is based on the juxtaposition of consent to coercion. Autocracy and slavery were based on coercion whereas today's political democracy and economic "employment system" are based on consent to voluntary contracts. This article retrieves an almost forgotten dark side of contractarian thought that based autocracy and slavery on explicit or implicit voluntary contracts. The democratic and antislavery movements forged arguments not simply in favor of consent but arguments that voluntary contracts to alienate (translatio) aspects of personhood were invalid--which made the underlying rights inalienable. Once understood, those arguments apply as well to today's self-rental contract, the employer-employee contract. 10.1177/0032329205278463


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.