Evolutionary engagement in an ongoing collaborative work process: a case study Export

@inproceedings{citeulike:1047228, address = {New York, NY, USA}, author = {Moran, Thomas P. and Chiu, Patrick and Harrison, Steve and Kurtenbach, Gordon and Minneman, Scott and van Melle, William}, booktitle = {CSCW '96: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work}, citeulike-article-id = {1047228}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=240243}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/240080.240243}, comment = {evolutionary engagement vs living laboratory support; capture; index; access emphasizes usability and utility (same as lesson 3 above) How does this style of evaluation compare to that done by folks in this room who are not cs people? What about cs people? Is there anything interesting to observe (regarding evaluation issues) about the fact that it took 3 months/2 meetings each for audio recording to be accepted? THe idea of topic and process notes (indexical) --developed because of the situated eval. Similarly, understanding how audio was used as a resource }, doi = {10.1145/240080.240243}, isbn = {0897917650}, keywords = {audio, cs-mini, cscw, evaluation, evolutionary-engagement, hcii-minis, information-systems, input, interfaces, output, recognition, synchronous-interaction, ubicomp}, pages = {150--159}, posted-at = {2007-01-17 21:30:27}, priority = {0}, publisher = {ACM Press}, title = {Evolutionary engagement in an ongoing collaborative work process: a case study}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/240080.240243}, year = {1996} }

TY - CONF ID - citeulike:1047228 L3 - citeulike-article-id:1047228 SN - 0897917650 AD - New York, NY, USA EP - 159 TI - Evolutionary engagement in an ongoing collaborative work process: a case study PB - ACM Press T2 - CSCW '96: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work SP - 150 KW - audio KW - cs-mini KW - cscw KW - evaluation KW - evolutionary-engagement KW - hcii-minis KW - information-systems KW - input KW - interfaces KW - output KW - recognition KW - synchronous-interaction KW - ubicomp N1 - evolutionary engagement vs living laboratory support; capture; index; access emphasizes usability and utility (same as lesson 3 above) How does this style of evaluation compare to that done by folks in this room who are not cs people? What about cs people? Is there anything interesting to observe (regarding evaluation issues) about the fact that it took 3 months/2 meetings each for audio recording to be accepted? THe idea of topic and process notes (indexical) --developed because of the situated eval. Similarly, understanding how audio was used as a resource AU - Moran, Thomas AU - Chiu, Patrick AU - Harrison, Steve AU - Kurtenbach, Gordon AU - Minneman, Scott AU - van Melle, William PY - 1996/// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/240080.240243 ER -