CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Difficulty of symptom control and general practitioners' knowledge of patients' symptoms. Export

Palliat Med, Vol. 11, No. 5. (September 1997), pp. 399-406.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


hera's tags for this article

physician symptoms

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

hera has 0 private notes and 1 public note for this article.

geen full text

hera (public note) - 2007-04-10 20:50:17

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate barriers to adequate symptom control in palliative care within primary care by surveying health professionals' perceptions of their ability to control symptoms and awareness of their patients' symptoms. General practitioners (GPs) and district nurses were surveyed about general views of symptom control. Interviews with terminally ill patients were conducted, and GPs completed questionnaires about these specific patients. GPs and district nurses differed greatly in the symptoms they felt confident in controlling. There was generally low agreement between patients' and GP's reports of patients' symptoms. GPs were most likely to miss symptoms which were perceived to be difficult to control and which were less prevalent in the patient sample. As GPs and district nurses differ in the symptoms they feel confident in controlling, close teamwork between the two professions may enhance the prospects for adequate control of some symptoms. Perceived ability to control symptoms and the prevalence of symptoms may both influence which symptoms come to the attention of the GP. Unless GPs ask directly about symptoms, many symptoms are likely to be missed.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.