C++ Theory and Practice: const as a Promise Export

@article{citeulike:5118575, abstract = {Until recently, I had the impression that gentle nudging was all that many C++ programmers needed to hop on the {\tt const} wagon. But over the past year, I've been querying my lecture audiences a little more deeply about const, and found that at least half of them apparently have some fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of constness in C++ and C. So I feel moved to write a few words to help alleviate that confusion.}, author = {Saks, Dan}, citeulike-article-id = {5118575}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://www.ddj.com/cpp/184403256}, journal = {C/C++ Users Journal}, keywords = {best-practice, const, cplusplus, practice, programming, technique, theory}, month = {November}, number = {11}, pages = {81--85}, posted-at = {2009-07-11 16:40:37}, priority = {2}, title = {C++ Theory and Practice: {\tt const} as a Promise}, url = {http://www.ddj.com/cpp/184403256}, volume = {14}, year = {1996} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:5118575 L3 - citeulike-article-id:5118575 N2 - Until recently, I had the impression that gentle nudging was all that many C++ programmers needed to hop on the {\tt const} wagon. But over the past year, I've been querying my lecture audiences a little more deeply about const, and found that at least half of them apparently have some fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of constness in C++ and C. So I feel moved to write a few words to help alleviate that confusion. IS - 11 JF - C/C++ Users Journal EP - 85 TI - C++ Theory and Practice: {\tt const} as a Promise VL - 14 SP - 81 KW - best-practice KW - const KW - cplusplus KW - practice KW - programming KW - technique KW - theory AU - Saks, Dan PY - 1996/11// UR - http://www.ddj.com/cpp/184403256 ER -