CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Just How Joint Is Joint Action in Infancy? Export

Topics in Cognitive Science, Vol. 1, No. 2. (2009), pp. 380-392.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


hkreysa's tags for this article

action attention commitment common communication cooperation goal ground helping infancy intentionality joint shared

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

hkreysa has 2 private notes and 0 public notes for this article. If you are hkreysa then you can log in to see the private notes.

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Joint action is central to countless aspects of human life. Here I examine the roots of joint action in infancy. First, I provide evidence that2014contrary to popular belief20141-year-old infants do have the social-cognitive prerequisites needed to participate in joint action, even in a relatively strict sense: they can read others' goals and intentions, they have some basic understanding of common knowledge, and they have the ability and motivation to help others achieve their goals. Then I review some evidence of infants' and young children's active participation in different types of joint action, from prelinguistic communication to more instrumental collaborations with others, with a particular focus on whether young children show evidence of an understanding of the commitments and obligations entailed in joint action. I conclude that the uniquely human ability and motivation to participate in joint action is already seen in infants by 1 year of age.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.