CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)

by: Charles R. Graham
Computers & Education, Vol. 57, No. 3. (November 2011), pp. 1953-1960, doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.010  Key: citeulike:9277562

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

The technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework is increasing in use by educational technology researchers around the world who are interested in issues related to technology integration. Much that is good can be found in the TPACK framework; however considerable theoretical work needs to be done if TPACK research is to cohere and constructively strengthen the field of educational technology. This paper uses Whetten’s (1989) criteria for theory building as a lens for examining the TPACK framework. Specific weaknesses are identified, which in turn suggest areas needing theoretical development. This paper calls for researchers to increase emphasis on using research findings to constructively build common definitions and understandings of the TPACK constructs and the boundaries between them. ⺠Uses theory building as a lens for examining the TPACK framework. ⺠Identifies specific weaknesses in the current framework that need to be addressed by the research community. ⺠Calls for a better articulation of construct definitions and the boundaries between the constructs in the TPACK framework.


ian2512's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.