From the Margins to the Mainstream? Disaster Research at the Crossroads

@article{citeulike:2766780, abstract = {Abstract The sociology of disasters has developed in ways that have weakened its ties with mainstream sociology. It has remained remarkably resistant to changes in the broader sociological landscape, and its strong applied focus has been a barrier to theoretical innovation. This situation is changing, as indicated by critiques of traditional ways of conceptualizing and explaining disasters; greater acceptance of constructivist formulations; willingness to acknowledge that disasters are accompanied by both social solidarity and social conflict; and recognition of the significance of the interaction of disasters and risk with gender, class, and other axes of inequality. However, the field is unlikely to overcome its marginal status without significant efforts to link the sociology of disasters with the related fields of risk and environmental sociology and, more broadly, to focus on core sociological concerns, such as social inequality, diversity, and social change.}, author = {Tierney, Kathleen J. }, citeulike-article-id = {2766780}, doi = {10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131743}, journal = {Annual Review of Sociology}, keywords = {disaster, sociology}, number = {1}, pages = {503--525}, posted-at = {2008-05-07 16:15:28}, priority = {2}, title = {From the Margins to the Mainstream? Disaster Research at the Crossroads}, url = {http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131743}, volume = {33}, year = {2007} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:2766780 L3 - citeulike-article-id:2766780 TI - From the Margins to the Mainstream? Disaster Research at the Crossroads JF - Annual Review of Sociology VL - 33 IS - 1 SP - 503 EP - 525 N2 - Abstract The sociology of disasters has developed in ways that have weakened its ties with mainstream sociology. It has remained remarkably resistant to changes in the broader sociological landscape, and its strong applied focus has been a barrier to theoretical innovation. This situation is changing, as indicated by critiques of traditional ways of conceptualizing and explaining disasters; greater acceptance of constructivist formulations; willingness to acknowledge that disasters are accompanied by both social solidarity and social conflict; and recognition of the significance of the interaction of disasters and risk with gender, class, and other axes of inequality. However, the field is unlikely to overcome its marginal status without significant efforts to link the sociology of disasters with the related fields of risk and environmental sociology and, more broadly, to focus on core sociological concerns, such as social inequality, diversity, and social change. KW - disaster KW - sociology AU - Tierney, Kathleen PY - 2007/// UR - http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131743 ER -