Eighteen low and medium resolution empirical energy functions were tested for their ability to distinguish correct from incorrect folds from three test sets of decoy protein conformations. The energy functions included 13 pairwise potentials of mean force, covering a wide range of functional forms and methods of parameterization, four potentials that attempt to detect properly formed hydrophobic cores, and one environment-based potential. The first of the three test sets consists of large ensembles of plausible conformations for eight small proteins, all of which have correct native secondary structure and are reasonably compact. The second is the set of all subconformations in a database of known protein structures applied to the sequences in that database (ungapped threading). The third is a set of ensembles of 1000 conformations each for seven small proteins taken from molecular dynamics simulations at 298 K and 498 K. Our results show that there are functions effective for each challenge set; moreover, success in one test is no guarantee of success in another. We examine the factors that seem to be important for accurate discrimination of correct structures in each of the test sets, and note that extremely simple functions are often as effective as more complex functions.
Search
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
