![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
jackjackjjj's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Growth factor dependent AKT activation and cell migration requires the function of c-K(B)-Ras versus other cellular Ras isoforms. |
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Notes for this article
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractK-Ras negative fibroblasts are defective in their steady-state expression of MMP-2. This occurs through c-K(B)-Ras dependent regulation of basal levels of AKT activity. In this report, we have extended those studies to demonstrate that in the absence of K-Ras expression, PDGF-BB fails to induce significant AKT activation, though this was not the case in N-Ras negative cells. This phenotype was directly linked to PDGF-dependent cell migration. All of the independently immortalized K-Ras negative cells failed to migrate upon addition of PDGF. Only ectopic expression of c-K(B)-Ras, not c-K(A)-Ras or oncogenic N-Ras could restore both PDGF-dependent AKT activation and cell migration. Since most Ras binding partners can interact with all Ras isoforms, the specificity of PDGF-dependent activation of AKT and enhanced cell migration suggests these outcomes are likely to be regulated through a c-K(B)-Ras specific binding partner. Others have published that of the four Ras isoforms, only K(B)-Ras can form a stable complex with calmodulin (CaM). Along those lines, we provide evidence that (1) PDGF addition results in increased levels of a complex between c-K(B)-Ras and CaM and (2) the biological outcomes that are strictly dependent on c-K(B)-Ras (AKT activation and cell migration) are blocked by CaM antagonists. The PDGF dependent activation of ERK is unaffected by the absence of K(B)-Ras and presence of CaM antagonists. This is the first example of a linkage between a specific biological outcome, cell migration, and the activity of a single Ras isoform, c-K(B)-Ras.
BibTeX record
RIS record