Revisiting the omitted variables argument: Substantive vs. statistical adequacy Export

@article{citeulike:713306, author = {Spanos and Aris}, citeulike-article-id = {713306}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501780600730687}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/rjec/2006/00000013/00000002/art00003}, doi = {10.1080/13501780600730687}, issn = {1350-178X}, journal = {Journal of Economic Methodology}, keywords = {causal\_inference, statistics}, month = {June}, number = {2}, pages = {179--218}, posted-at = {2006-09-21 18:46:01}, priority = {2}, publisher = {Routledge, part of the Taylor \& Francis Group}, title = {Revisiting the omitted variables argument: Substantive vs. statistical adequacy}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501780600730687}, volume = {13}, year = {2006} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:713306 L3 - citeulike-article-id:713306 IS - 2 JF - Journal of Economic Methodology SN - 1350-178X EP - 218 TI - Revisiting the omitted variables argument: Substantive vs. statistical adequacy PB - Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group VL - 13 SP - 179 KW - causal_inference KW - statistics AU - Spanos AU - Aris PY - 2006/06// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501780600730687 ER -