CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Who Fought the Algerian War? Political Identity and Conflict in French-Ruled Algeria Export

International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, Vol. 16, No. 1. (1 September 2002), pp. 55-97.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


jannon's tags for this article

1950s 19thcentury 20thcentury algeria algiers collectiveaction colonialism conflict decolonialism france history identity metropole nationalism natives organizations politcs settlers social war

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

jannon has 1 private note and 0 public notes for this article. If you are jannon then you can log in to see the private note.

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Why did settlers, natives, and metropolitan agents fight each other as “French” and “Algerian” during the famously brutal Algerian War of the 1950s? While scholars identify key factors in launching and escalating the war, they take for granted that it was fought between “the French” and “the Algerians” when evidence shows that those terms were also a source of struggle among the parties involved in the war. Drawing on insights from the fields of colonial studies and collective action, along with archival sources, the article explains why this particular set of terms framed the war, in other words, why the categories “French” and “Algerian” predominated in the political discourse, and why they were so opposed to each other. It contends that punctuated political conflicts among state authorities and social-movement organizations in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, rather than indigenous cultural or social structural factors, played a key role in constructing this identity framework. The article concludes by challenging our basic definitions of the war and the prevailing theories about its course and outcomes.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.