CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

In vivo serial diffusion tensor imaging of experimental spinal cord injury. Export

J Neurosci Res, Vol. 83, No. 5. (April 2006), pp. 801-810.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


jcohenadad's tags for this article

animal dti injury spinal-cord

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

jcohenadad has 0 private notes and 1 public note for this article.

comparison of FA in injuried spinal cord of rats. METHODS: 7T, EPI

jcohenadad (public note) - 2006-08-10 20:19:10

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

In vivo longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of rodent spinal cord injury (SCI) was carried out over a period of eight weeks post-injury. A balanced, rotationally invariant, alternating gradient polarity icosahedral diffusion encoding scheme was used for an unbiased estimation of the DTI metrics. The fractional anisotropy (FA), diffusivities along (longitudinal), and perpendicular (transverse) to the fiber tracts, were estimated for the ventral, dorsal, and lateral white matter. In all the three regions, the DTI metrics were observed to be significantly different in injured cords relative to the uninjured controls close to the epicenter of the injury. However, these differences gradually disappeared away from the epicenter. The spatio-temporal changes in the DTI metrics showed a recovery pattern that is region specific. Although the temporal trends in the tissue recovery in rostral and caudal sections seem to be similar, overall the DTI metrics were observed to be closer to the normal tissue values in the caudal relative to the rostral sections (rostral-caudal asymmetry).


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.