CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Discovering Dependencies via Algorithmic Mutual Information: A Case Study in DNA Sequence Comparisons Export

Machine Learning, Vol. 21, No. 1. (1 October 1995), pp. 35-50.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


jengeldk's tags for this article

mutual_information similarity_measure

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Algorithmic mutual information is a central concept in algorithmic information theory and may be measured as the difference between independent and joint minimal encoding lengths of objects; it is also a central concept in Chaitin's fascinating mathematical definition of life. We explore applicability of algorithmic mutual information as a tool for discovering dependencies in biology. In order to determine significance of discovered dependencies, we extend the newly proposed algorithmic significance method. The main theorem of the extended method states that d bits of algorithmic mutual information imply dependency at the significance level 2-d+O(1). We apply a heuristic version of the method to one of the main problems in DNA and protein sequence comparisons: the problem of deciding whether observed similarity between sequences should be explained by their relatedness or by the mere presence of some shared internal structure, e.g., shared internal repetitive patterns. We take advantage of the fact that mutual information factors out sequence similarity that is due to shared internal structure and thus enables discovery of truly related sequences. In addition to providing a general framework for sequence comparisons, we also propose an efficient way to compare sequences based on their subword composition that does not require any a priori assumptions about k-tuple length.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.