CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Cultural Differences in Attitudes Toward Action and Inaction: The Role of Dialecticism

by: Ethan Zell, Rong Su, Hong Li, Moon-Ho R. Ho, Sungjin Hong, Tarcan Kumkale, Jerome Rossier, Koorosh Massoudi, Huajian Cai, Sonia Roccas, Javier Arce-Michel, Cristina de Sousa, Rolando Diaz-Loving, Maria M. Botero, Lucia Mannetti, Claudia Garcia, Pilar Carrera, Amparo Cabalero, Masatake Ikemi, Darius Chan, Allan Bernardo, Fernando Garcia, Inge Brechan, Greg Maio, Dolores AlbarracĂ­n
Social Psychological and Personality Science (14 December 2012), doi:10.1177/1948550612468774  Key: citeulike:12011125

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

The current research examined whether nations differ in their attitudes toward action and inaction. It was anticipated that members of dialectical East Asian societies would show a positive association in their attitudes toward action/inaction. However, members of non-dialectical European-American societies were expected to show a negative association in their attitudes toward action/inaction. Young adults in 19 nations completed measures of dialectical thinking and attitudes toward action/inaction. Results from multi-level modeling showed, as predicted, that people from high dialecticism nations reported a more positive association in their attitudes toward action and inaction than people from low dialecticism nations. Furthermore, these findings remained after controlling for cultural differences in individualism-collectivism, neuroticism, gross-domestic product, and response style. Discussion highlights the implications of these findings for action/inaction goals, dialecticism, and culture.


jlaronge's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.