Estimating species richness: Sensitivity to sample coverage and insensitivity to spatial patterns Export

@article{RefWorks:108, abstract = {The number of species in an area is critical to the development of evolutionary and ecological theory from mass extinctions to island biogeography. Still, the factors influencing the accuracy of estimators of species richness are poorly understood. We explored these factors by simulating landscapes, that varied in species richness, relative abundances, and the spatial distribution. We compared the extrapolations of nine nonparametric estimators and two species accumulation curves under three sampling intensities. Community evenness of species' abundances, sampling intensity, and the level of true species richness significantly influenced bias, precision, and accuracy of the estimations. Perhaps most surprisingly, the effects of gradient strength and spatial autocorrelation type were generally insignificant. The nonparametric estimators were substantially less biased and more precise than the species accumulation curves. Observed species richness was most biased. Community evenness, sampling intensity, and the level of true species richness influenced the performance of the nonparametric estimators indirectly via the fraction of all species found in a sample or "sample coverage." For each particular level of sample coverage, a single estimator was most accurate. Choice of estimator is confounded by a priori uncertainty about the sample coverage. Accordingly, researchers can extrapolate species richness by various estimators and base the estimator choice on the mean estimated sample coverage. Alternatively, the most reliable estimator with respect to community evenness can be chosen. These predictions from our simulations are confirmed in two field studies.}, author = {Brose, U. and Martinez, N. D. and Williams, R. J.}, citeulike-article-id = {309096}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://www.esajournals.org/esaonline/?request=get-document&issn=0012-9658&volume=084&issue=09&page=2364}, journal = {Ecology}, keywords = {autocorrelation, community-structure, diversity, refworks-import, sampling, spatial-pattern, species-area-relationship}, month = {SEP}, number = {9}, pages = {2364--2377}, posted-at = {2005-08-31 18:41:56}, priority = {0}, title = {Estimating species richness: Sensitivity to sample coverage and insensitivity to spatial patterns}, url = {http://www.esajournals.org/esaonline/?request=get-document&issn=0012-9658&volume=084&issue=09&page=2364}, volume = {84}, year = {2003} }

TY - JOUR ID - RefWorks:108 L3 - citeulike-article-id:309096 N2 - The number of species in an area is critical to the development of evolutionary and ecological theory from mass extinctions to island biogeography. Still, the factors influencing the accuracy of estimators of species richness are poorly understood. We explored these factors by simulating landscapes, that varied in species richness, relative abundances, and the spatial distribution. We compared the extrapolations of nine nonparametric estimators and two species accumulation curves under three sampling intensities. Community evenness of species' abundances, sampling intensity, and the level of true species richness significantly influenced bias, precision, and accuracy of the estimations. Perhaps most surprisingly, the effects of gradient strength and spatial autocorrelation type were generally insignificant. The nonparametric estimators were substantially less biased and more precise than the species accumulation curves. Observed species richness was most biased. Community evenness, sampling intensity, and the level of true species richness influenced the performance of the nonparametric estimators indirectly via the fraction of all species found in a sample or "sample coverage." For each particular level of sample coverage, a single estimator was most accurate. Choice of estimator is confounded by a priori uncertainty about the sample coverage. Accordingly, researchers can extrapolate species richness by various estimators and base the estimator choice on the mean estimated sample coverage. Alternatively, the most reliable estimator with respect to community evenness can be chosen. These predictions from our simulations are confirmed in two field studies. IS - 9 JF - Ecology EP - 2377 TI - Estimating species richness: Sensitivity to sample coverage and insensitivity to spatial patterns VL - 84 SP - 2364 KW - autocorrelation KW - community-structure KW - diversity KW - refworks-import KW - sampling KW - spatial-pattern KW - species-area-relationship AU - Brose, U AU - Martinez, ND AU - Williams, RJ PY - 2003/SEP// UR - http://www.esajournals.org/esaonline/?request=get-document&issn=0012-9658&volume=084&issue=09&page=2364 ER -