CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Comparison of surface radiative flux parameterizations - Part II: Longwave Radiation Export

Atmospheric Research, Vol. 58, No. 2001., pp. 1-18.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


jmshea's tags for this article

radiation shortwave

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

This paper presents a comparison of several longwave (LW) downwelling radiative flux parameterizations with hourly averaged pointwise surface-radiation observations made at Sodankyla, Finland, in 1997 and 1999. Both clear and cloudy nighttime conditions are considered. The comparisons covered a 2-m temperature range from +11oC all the way to -49oC.The clear-sky comparisons included eight simple LW parameterizations, which mainly use screen-level input data, and four radiation schemes from numerical weather prediction (NWP) models: the former European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) scheme, the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD) scheme, the High Resolution Limited Area Model (HIRLAM) scheme, and the new ECMWF LW scheme (Rapid Radiative Transfer Model, RRTM). Atmospheric-sounding profiles were used as input for the NWP schemes. For the cases with clouds, three simple cloud-correction methods were tested.Almost all LW schemes usually underestimated the downwelling clear-sky flux, particularly, in cold (surface inversion) conditions. Overall, the RRTM scheme performed best. The simple cloud-correction methods turned out to be useful in the LW region. Finally, some new simple parameterization formulas were developed using the present data.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.