CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

An essay on ascending Glastonbury Tor Export

Geoforum, Vol. 33, No. 4. (November 2002), pp. 441-454.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


josiasporter's tags for this article

no-tag

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

This paper offers a personal account of ascending Glastonbury Tor, a prominent hill in Somerset, south-west England. Aiming to abet but also inflect interpretation of the contemporary and historical cultural significance of hill-climbing, the paper uses the ascent of the Tor as a means of illustrating the possibility of writing otherwise the ontological and epistemological motifs commonly associated with practices of ascension and elevation. After briefly outlining Glastonbury's complex cultural histories, the well-known story of Francesco Petrarch's ascent of Mt. Ventoux in France serves as a point of entry into the links between an ‘elevated' view and Cartesian spectatorial epistemologies. I then advocate the writings of Merleau-Ponty as offering a sustained antidote to the binarism of subject and object, seer and seen, which is central to such models of knowing. Following Merleau-Ponty, I argue that ascension and elevation are amenable to description as enlacements of self and landscape, as intertwinings of vision and the visible. The account of ascending Glastonbury Tor presented here may be regarded as an attempt to explore and exemplify this position. The claim is that the production of an incarnate subjectivity within practices of ascension may be understood in the context of an ontology of visibility which both accounts for, and problematises, the distinction of seer and seen.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.