CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Preempting the future: rhetoric and ideology of the future in political discourse Export

Discourse Society, Vol. 16, No. 4. (1 July 2005), pp. 481-513.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


jpbenda's tags for this article

political-discourse rhetoric time

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

This article posits that an important ideological component of political discourse derives from its representation of the future and the rhetorical functions those representations serve in implicating more immediate material and discursive actions. Working within a systemic-functional framework, this study demonstrates how representations of the future are embedded in and projected through political discourse and how the public' is implicated in those representations. I focus on President Bush's speech on 7 October 2002, which presents his rationale for war against Iraq to a lay, public audience. The analysis shows that the nominalization threat' functions in multiple ways to construe a particular vision of future reality. Systematic contrasts in modality serve to privilege this future reality over alternative visions and, simultaneously, to implicate the public in the Administration's vision. I also consider the speech within the context of the Bush Administration's National Security Strategy, particularly its policy of preemption'. I argue that the President's speech plays a significant role in facilitating the conceptual, linguistic, and political change articulated through the preemption policy. 10.1177/0957926505053052


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.