The Impact Factor Game Export

@article{citeulike:694959, abstract = {The PLoS Medicine editors argue that we need a better measure than the impact factor for assessing the biomedical literature.}, author = {The PLoS Medicine Editors}, citeulike-article-id = {694959}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16749869}, citeulike-linkout-2 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=16749869}, day = {6}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291}, journal = {PLoS Med}, keywords = {miscellaneous}, month = {June}, number = {6}, pages = {e291+}, posted-at = {2007-10-09 11:39:42}, priority = {5}, publisher = {Public Library of Science}, title = {The Impact Factor Game}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291}, volume = {3}, year = {2006} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:694959 L3 - citeulike-article-id:694959 N2 - The PLoS Medicine editors argue that we need a better measure than the impact factor for assessing the biomedical literature. IS - 6 JF - PLoS Med TI - The Impact Factor Game PB - Public Library of Science VL - 3 SP - e291 KW - miscellaneous AU - The PLoS Medicine Editors PY - 2006/06/06/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291 ER -