CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Fungal Infections in Solid-Organ Transplantation

by: Carlos V. Paya
Clinical Infectious Diseases, Vol. 16, No. 5. (01 May 1993), pp. 677-688, doi:10.1093/clind/16.5.677  Key: citeulike:11895091

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

Fungal infections following solid-organ transplantation remain a major cause of morbidity and death. Their incidence ranges from 5% among recipients of kidney transplants to as high as 40% among recipients of liver transplants. Species of Candida and Aspergillus account for more than 80% of fungal episodes. Moreover, more than 80% of fungal infections occur within the first 2 months after transplantation, with a resulting mortality of 30%–100%. The pathogenesis of infection and the risk factors involved depend on the type of transplant and the infecting microorganism. Cyclosporine has not significantly reduced the incidence or severity of fungal infections in this population. The value of surveillance cultures and fungal antigen detection in solid-organ transplant recipients remains to be determined. Amphotericin B is still a first-line drug, but its potential nephrotoxicity makes its use problematic, especially in renal transplant recipients. Fluconazole is a potential alternative for the treatment of infections due to Candida species and Cryptococcus neoformans. The role of antifungal compounds in the prophylaxis of fungal infection in recipients of solid-organ transplants needs to be established.


jscrivani's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.