Register | Log in | FAQ      [?] 
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

kharke's Bouter [5 articles]

Recent papers posted to kharke's library by the author Bouter. You can also see everyone's Bouter.
  • Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 6 (13 June 2006), 27.
    by Beverley J Shea, Maarten Boers, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Candyce D Hamel, Lex M Bouter
    posted to systematic_reviews quality by kharke on 2008-07-11 19:37:13 as **
  • Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
    BMC Med Res Methodol, Vol. 6 (2006), 27.
    by B Shea, M Boers, JM Grimshaw, C Hamel, LM Bouter
    posted to quality publishing file-import-08-06-13 by kharke on 2008-06-13 22:42:52 as **
  • notes Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group
    J Rheumatol, Vol. 33, No. 1. (2006), 9-15.
    by B Shea, LM Bouter, JM Grimshaw, D Francis, Z Ortiz, GA Wells, PS Tugwell, M Boers
    posted to quality publishing file-import-08-06-13 by kharke on 2008-06-13 22:42:52 as **
  • notes Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies
    Radiology, Vol. 235, No. 2. (2005), 347-53.
    by N Smidt, AW Rutjes, DA van der Windt, RW Ostelo, JB Reitsma, PM Bossuyt, LM Bouter, HC de Vet
    posted to quality publishing file-import-08-06-13 citation_errors by kharke on 2008-06-11 16:24:44 as **
  • Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 2, No. 1. (2002)
    by Walter Deville, Frank Buntinx, Lex Bouter, Victor Montori, Henrica de Vet, Danielle van der Windt, P Bezemer
  • Note: You may cite this page as: http://www.citeulike.org/user/kharke/author/Bouter

    RIS BibTeX
    CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.