John Dean's memory: A case study Export

@article{citeulike:4220536, abstract = {John Dean, the former counsel to President Richard Nixon, testified to the Senate Watergate Investigating Committee about conversations that later turned out to have been tape recorded. Comparison of his testimony with the actual transcripts shows systematic distortion at one level of analysis combined with basic accuracy at another. Many of the distortions reflected Dean's own self-image; he tended to recall his role as more central than it really was. Moreover, his memory for even the ” gist” of conversations was quite poor except where that gist had been rehearsed in advance or frequently repeated. But while his testimony was often wrong in terms of the particular conversations he tried to describe, Dean was fundamentally right about what had been happening: the existence of a ” cover-up” and the participation of various individuals in it. His testimony was accurate at a level that is neither ” semantic” (since he was ostensibly describing particular episodes) nor ” episodic” (since his accounts of the episodes were often wrong). The term ” repisodic” is coined here to describe such memories: what seems to be a remembered episode actually represents a repeated series of events, and thus reflects a genuinely existing state of affairs.}, author = {Neisser, U.}, citeulike-article-id = {4220536}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(81)90011-1}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0010-0277(81)90011-1}, doi = {10.1016/0010-0277(81)90011-1}, issn = {00100277}, journal = {Cognition}, keywords = {constructive-memory, memory}, number = {1}, pages = {1--22}, posted-at = {2009-10-30 13:50:23}, priority = {2}, title = {John Dean's memory: A case study}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(81)90011-1}, volume = {9}, year = {1981} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:4220536 L3 - citeulike-article-id:4220536 N2 - John Dean, the former counsel to President Richard Nixon, testified to the Senate Watergate Investigating Committee about conversations that later turned out to have been tape recorded. Comparison of his testimony with the actual transcripts shows systematic distortion at one level of analysis combined with basic accuracy at another. Many of the distortions reflected Dean's own self-image; he tended to recall his role as more central than it really was. Moreover, his memory for even the “gist” of conversations was quite poor except where that gist had been rehearsed in advance or frequently repeated. But while his testimony was often wrong in terms of the particular conversations he tried to describe, Dean was fundamentally right about what had been happening: the existence of a “cover-up” and the participation of various individuals in it. His testimony was accurate at a level that is neither “semantic” (since he was ostensibly describing particular episodes) nor “episodic” (since his accounts of the episodes were often wrong). The term “repisodic” is coined here to describe such memories: what seems to be a remembered episode actually represents a repeated series of events, and thus reflects a genuinely existing state of affairs. IS - 1 JF - Cognition SN - 00100277 EP - 22 TI - John Dean's memory: A case study VL - 9 SP - 1 KW - constructive-memory KW - memory AU - Neisser, U PY - 1981/// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(81)90011-1 ER -