Spectral analysis of heart rate variability: interchangeability between autoregressive analysis and fast Fourier transform. Export

@article{citeulike:1649716, abstract = {Interchangeability between fast Fourier transform (FFT) and autoregressive (AR) analysis was assessed on series of 256 R-R intervals recorded in 56 seated subjects and in 15 men performing an orthostatic test. Low- (LF) and high-frequency (HF) components were calculated and expressed both in absolute (square milliseconds) and normalized units (NU). During orthostatic stress, the same upward trend for LF square milliseconds and LF/HF ratio and downward trend for HF square milliseconds and HF NU were observed with FFT and AR analysis. However, the values for HF square milliseconds were significantly greater with FFT, as compared with AR analysis in standing position (P < .05). Moreover, Bland \& Altman method highlighted a large discrepancy between the results of FFT and AR analysis for all heart rate variability indices in the 3 conditions. Therefore, parametric and nonparametric spectral analyses could not be considered as interchangeable at rest in healthy subjects even if they give same qualitative results.}, address = {Laboratoire des Adaptations Physiologiques aux Activit\'{e}s Physiques, UPRES EA 3813, Facult\'{e} des Sciences du Sport, Poitiers, France. aurelien.pichon@orange.fr}, author = {Pichon, A. and Roulaud, M. and Antoine-Jonville, S. and de Bisschop, C. and Denjean, A.}, citeulike-article-id = {1649716}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.08.001}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16387047}, citeulike-linkout-2 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=16387047}, doi = {10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.08.001}, issn = {0022-0736}, journal = {J Electrocardiol}, keywords = {hrv, methodology}, month = {January}, number = {1}, pages = {31--37}, posted-at = {2007-09-12 23:00:40}, priority = {2}, title = {Spectral analysis of heart rate variability: interchangeability between autoregressive analysis and fast Fourier transform.}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.08.001}, volume = {39}, year = {2006} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:1649716 L3 - citeulike-article-id:1649716 N2 - Interchangeability between fast Fourier transform (FFT) and autoregressive (AR) analysis was assessed on series of 256 R-R intervals recorded in 56 seated subjects and in 15 men performing an orthostatic test. Low- (LF) and high-frequency (HF) components were calculated and expressed both in absolute (square milliseconds) and normalized units (NU). During orthostatic stress, the same upward trend for LF square milliseconds and LF/HF ratio and downward trend for HF square milliseconds and HF NU were observed with FFT and AR analysis. However, the values for HF square milliseconds were significantly greater with FFT, as compared with AR analysis in standing position (P < .05). Moreover, Bland & Altman method highlighted a large discrepancy between the results of FFT and AR analysis for all heart rate variability indices in the 3 conditions. Therefore, parametric and nonparametric spectral analyses could not be considered as interchangeable at rest in healthy subjects even if they give same qualitative results. IS - 1 JF - J Electrocardiol SN - 0022-0736 AD - Laboratoire des Adaptations Physiologiques aux Activités Physiques, UPRES EA 3813, Faculté des Sciences du Sport, Poitiers, France. aurelien.pichon@orange.fr EP - 37 TI - Spectral analysis of heart rate variability: interchangeability between autoregressive analysis and fast Fourier transform. VL - 39 SP - 31 KW - hrv KW - methodology AU - Pichon, A AU - Roulaud, M AU - Antoine-Jonville, S AU - de Bisschop, C AU - Denjean, A PY - 2006/01// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.08.001 ER -