Age of face matters: age-group differences in ratings of young and old faces. Export

@article{citeulike:3422238, abstract = {Young (n = 24) and old (n = 24) participants rated 160 faces of young and old individuals taken from the CAL/PAL Face Database (Minear \& Park, 2004) with regard to attractiveness, likeability, distinctiveness, goal orientation, energy, mood, and age. Ratings are reported for each face separately. Further analyses showed that the age groups differed in their ratings of young and old faces. On average, old participants evaluated the faces as more positive (i.e., more attractive, more energetic) than did young participants. In line with research on a negative aging stereotype, old faces were judged as less positive than young faces. They were, for instance, seen as less attractive, less likeable, less distinctive, less growth-oriented, and less energetic. The findings of the present study can serve as a basis for the selection of appropriate facial stimuli in age-comparative studies of face perception, face processing, or memory for faces. All face-specific data are archived at www.psychonomic.org/archive.}, author = {Ebner, N. C.}, citeulike-article-id = {3422238}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18411535}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=18411535}, issn = {1554-351X}, journal = {Behavior research methods}, keywords = {aging, attractiveness, database, face, rating}, month = {February}, number = {1}, pages = {130--136}, posted-at = {2008-10-16 22:25:39}, priority = {2}, title = {Age of face matters: age-group differences in ratings of young and old faces.}, url = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18411535}, volume = {40}, year = {2008} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:3422238 L3 - citeulike-article-id:3422238 N2 - Young (n = 24) and old (n = 24) participants rated 160 faces of young and old individuals taken from the CAL/PAL Face Database (Minear & Park, 2004) with regard to attractiveness, likeability, distinctiveness, goal orientation, energy, mood, and age. Ratings are reported for each face separately. Further analyses showed that the age groups differed in their ratings of young and old faces. On average, old participants evaluated the faces as more positive (i.e., more attractive, more energetic) than did young participants. In line with research on a negative aging stereotype, old faces were judged as less positive than young faces. They were, for instance, seen as less attractive, less likeable, less distinctive, less growth-oriented, and less energetic. The findings of the present study can serve as a basis for the selection of appropriate facial stimuli in age-comparative studies of face perception, face processing, or memory for faces. All face-specific data are archived at www.psychonomic.org/archive. IS - 1 JF - Behavior research methods SN - 1554-351X EP - 136 TI - Age of face matters: age-group differences in ratings of young and old faces. VL - 40 SP - 130 KW - aging KW - attractiveness KW - database KW - face KW - rating AU - Ebner, NC PY - 2008/02// UR - http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18411535 ER -