Use of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to assess eyewitness accuracy and deception Export

@article{citeulike:5308820, abstract = {This study investigated eyewitness identification using ERPs. Twenty participants completed two eyewitness lineup tasks (standard and deception conditions). For the standard condition, participants tried to accurately identify the culprit, whereas in the deception condition, they were asked to deceptively conceal their recognition of the culprit. Identification rates based on P300 patterns were calculated using two different individual analysis procedures (A and B) that varied in stringency. Correct identification rates for the standard condition were 100\% for both procedures A and B. For the deception condition, correct identification rates of the concealed culprit were 90\%, and 70\% respectively for procedures A and B. Data from a prior study [the culprit-absent condition from Lefebvre, C.D., Marchand, Y., Smith, S.M. \& Connolly, J.F., 2007. Determining eyewitness identification accuracy using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Psychophysiology, 44, 894–904.] was reanalysed to investigate differences in false identification rates based on procedures A and B. False identifications were substantially higher when using procedure A (29\%) versus procedure B (0\%). Overall, superiority was found for procedure B compared to procedure A based on Grier's A '.}, author = {Lefebvre, C. D. and Marchand, Y. and Smith, S. M. and Connolly, J. F.}, citeulike-article-id = {5308820}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.03.003}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167876009000622}, doi = {10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.03.003}, issn = {01678760}, journal = {International Journal of Psychophysiology}, keywords = {erp, eyewitness, lie}, month = {September}, number = {3}, pages = {218--225}, posted-at = {2009-07-31 14:53:45}, priority = {2}, title = {Use of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to assess eyewitness accuracy and deception}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.03.003}, volume = {73}, year = {2009} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:5308820 L3 - citeulike-article-id:5308820 N2 - This study investigated eyewitness identification using ERPs. Twenty participants completed two eyewitness lineup tasks (standard and deception conditions). For the standard condition, participants tried to accurately identify the culprit, whereas in the deception condition, they were asked to deceptively conceal their recognition of the culprit. Identification rates based on P300 patterns were calculated using two different individual analysis procedures (A and B) that varied in stringency. Correct identification rates for the standard condition were 100% for both procedures A and B. For the deception condition, correct identification rates of the concealed culprit were 90%, and 70% respectively for procedures A and B. Data from a prior study [the culprit-absent condition from Lefebvre, C.D., Marchand, Y., Smith, S.M. & Connolly, J.F., 2007. Determining eyewitness identification accuracy using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Psychophysiology, 44, 894–904.] was reanalysed to investigate differences in false identification rates based on procedures A and B. False identifications were substantially higher when using procedure A (29%) versus procedure B (0%). Overall, superiority was found for procedure B compared to procedure A based on Grier's A '. IS - 3 JF - International Journal of Psychophysiology SN - 01678760 EP - 225 TI - Use of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to assess eyewitness accuracy and deception VL - 73 SP - 218 KW - erp KW - eyewitness KW - lie AU - Lefebvre, CD AU - Marchand, Y AU - Smith, SM AU - Connolly, JF PY - 2009/09// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.03.003 ER -