CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

The effects of taxonomic aggregation on network analysis Export

Ecological Modelling, Vol. 149, No. 3. (1 April 2002), pp. 285-296.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


larios's tags for this article

ecology for_mana network taxonomy trophic

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

In their search for ever better trophic models, ecologists have often tried aggregating the number of species in order to better focus upon the variables that most interest them. Previous attempts at aggregating food webs have yielded varied results. We studied a series of different taxonomic aggregations on the same trophic network model of the Chesapeake Bay. The original 50-compartment model, which served as the control configuration, exhibited the highest value for the ascendency index. As expected, in those systems with fewer compartments the ascendency declined in monotonic fashion. The ascendency dropped precipitously for systems with fewer than 40 compartments and achieved its lowest value for systems with less than 29. Systems with the same number of compartments but different aggregations of species yielded different values of the ascendency. The aggregation of bacteria and ciliates resulted in a precipitous drop in the information of the network, revealing perhaps the significance of the microbial loop. Direct and indirect trophic impacts were also affected by the nature of the aggregation, and the impacts seemed to be exaggerated whenever species were lumped into single compartments.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.