Are we training pit bulls to review our manuscripts? Export

@article{citeulike:4158200, abstract = {Good early training of graduate students and postdocs is needed to prevent them turning into future generations of manuscript-savaging reviewers. How can we intercalate typical papers into our training?}, author = {Walbot, Virginia}, citeulike-article-id = {4158200}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/jbiol125}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19291274}, citeulike-linkout-2 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=19291274}, day = {09}, doi = {10.1186/jbiol125}, issn = {1475-4924}, journal = {Journal of Biology}, keywords = {cheap, reference}, month = {March}, number = {3}, pages = {24+}, posted-at = {2009-03-14 09:04:11}, priority = {2}, title = {Are we training pit bulls to review our manuscripts?}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/jbiol125}, volume = {8}, year = {2009} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:4158200 L3 - citeulike-article-id:4158200 N2 - Good early training of graduate students and postdocs is needed to prevent them turning into future generations of manuscript-savaging reviewers. How can we intercalate typical papers into our training? IS - 3 JF - Journal of Biology SN - 1475-4924 TI - Are we training pit bulls to review our manuscripts? VL - 8 SP - 24 KW - cheap KW - reference AU - Walbot, Virginia PY - 2009/03/09/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/jbiol125 ER -