CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Comparing Representations of Geographic Knowledge Expressed as Conceptual Graphs Export

edited by: Andra M. Rodriquez, Isabel F. Cruz, Max J. Egenhofer, Sergei Levashkin

GeoSpatial Semantics In GeoSpatial Semantics: First International Conference GeoS 2005, Vol. 3799 (November 2005), pp. 1-14.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


lisah2u's tags for this article

conceptual-graphs geographic geo-ontologies knowledge-representation

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Conceptual Graphs are a very powerful knowledge and meaning representation formalism grounded on deep philosophical, linguistic and object oriented principles [1], [2]. Concerning geographic knowledge representation and matching, the study and analysis of geographic concept definitions plays an important role in deriving systematic knowledge about concepts and comparing geographic categories in order to identify similarities and heterogeneities [4]. Based on the proposed algorithm for the representation of geographic knowledge using conceptual graphs, we also present a method that takes into consideration the special structure of conceptual graphs and produces an output that shows how much similar two geographic concepts are and hence which concept is semantically closer to another. For producing the conceptual graph representation of any geographic concept definition we follow two steps, tagging and parsing, while for measuring the similarity between two geographic ontologies we apply proper modifications to the Dice coefficient that is mainly used for comparing binary structures.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.