Beyond the Natural Resource and Environmental Sociology Divide: Insights from a Transdisciplinary Perspective Export

@article{citeulike:1359484, abstract = {DOI: 10.1080/089419202753445106 In response to the Field et al. (2001) and Buttel (2001) argument that there are distinct patterns that distinguish natural resource and environmental sociology, I argue that this is typical of a thriving multiparadigmatic social science and is occurring across other ecological social sciences. In this article I briefly review current debates among anthropologists and human geographers to illustrate the transdisciplinary relevance of the natural resource and environmental sociology division and to suggest approaches that integrate this divide and also provide bridges to other ecological social sciences. The ''bridging'' areas I discuss include political ecology, community conservation, and sustainable livelihoods. Natural resource/environmental sociologists have much to learn from engaging the works of each other and from other social and natural scientists.}, author = {Belsky, Jill M.}, citeulike-article-id = {1359484}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a713847877~db=all}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/089419202753445106}, doi = {10.1080/089419202753445106}, journal = {Society \& Natural Resources}, keywords = {3, anthropology, methodology, policy, resourcemanagement, sociology}, number = {3}, pages = {269--280}, posted-at = {2007-06-03 02:57:15}, priority = {0}, title = {Beyond the Natural Resource and Environmental Sociology Divide: Insights from a Transdisciplinary Perspective}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/089419202753445106}, volume = {15}, year = {2002} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:1359484 L3 - citeulike-article-id:1359484 N2 - DOI: 10.1080/089419202753445106 In response to the Field et al. (2001) and Buttel (2001) argument that there are distinct patterns that distinguish natural resource and environmental sociology, I argue that this is typical of a thriving multiparadigmatic social science and is occurring across other ecological social sciences. In this article I briefly review current debates among anthropologists and human geographers to illustrate the transdisciplinary relevance of the natural resource and environmental sociology division and to suggest approaches that integrate this divide and also provide bridges to other ecological social sciences. The ''bridging'' areas I discuss include political ecology, community conservation, and sustainable livelihoods. Natural resource/environmental sociologists have much to learn from engaging the works of each other and from other social and natural scientists. IS - 3 JF - Society & Natural Resources EP - 280 TI - Beyond the Natural Resource and Environmental Sociology Divide: Insights from a Transdisciplinary Perspective VL - 15 SP - 269 KW - 3 KW - anthropology KW - methodology KW - policy KW - resourcemanagement KW - sociology AU - Belsky, Jill PY - 2002/// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/089419202753445106 ER -