![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
matthijs's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddednessby: Brian Uzzi
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Notes for this articleERRATA On page 65 of "Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks" by Brian Uzzi (March 1997: 35-67), the correct 417/ASQ, June 1997 title and publisher of Mitchel Y. Abolafia's 1996 book is Mak- ing Markets: Opportunism and Restraint on Wall Street (Har- vard University Press). In Figure 6, on page 93 of "Chain Affiliation and the Failure of Manhattan Hotels, 1898-1980" by Paul Ingram and Joel A. C. Baum (March 1997: 68-102), the vertical axis should be labeled "Multiplier of the Rate," and the horizontal axis should be labeled "Age in Years." 418/ASQ,
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractThe purpose of this work is to develop a systematic understanding of embeddedness and organization networks. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted at 23 entrepreneurial firms, I identify the components of embedded relationships and explicate the devices by which embeddedness shapes organizational and economic outcomes. The findings suggest that embeddedness is a logic of exchange that promotes economies of time, integrative agreements, Pareto improvements in allocative efficiency, and complex adaptation. These positive effects rise up to a threshold, however, after which embeddedhess can derail economic performance by making firms vulnerable to exogenous shocks or insulating them from information that exists beyond their network. A framework is proposed that explains how these properties vary with the quality of social ties, the structure of the organization network, and an organization's structural position in the network."
BibTeX record
RIS record