![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
mcclurmc's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Strong Typing of Object-Oriented Languages RevisitedIn In OOPSLA-ECOOP '90 Proceedings, pages 140--150. ACM SIGPLAN Notices,25(10, Vol. 25 (1990), pp. 140-150.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractThis paper is concerned with the relation between subtyping and subclassing and their inuence on programming language design. Traditionally subclassing as introduced by Simula has also been used for dening a hierarchical type system. The type system of a language can be characterized as strong or weak and the type checking mechanism as static or dynamic. Parameterized classes in combination with a hierarchical type-system is an example of a language construct that is known to create complicated type checking situations. In this paper these situations are analyzed and several dierent solutions are found. It is argued that an approach with a combination of static and dynamic type checking gives a reasonable balance also here. It is also concluded that this approach makes it possible to base the type system on the class/subclass mechanism. 2 1 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the clarication of typing issues in object-oriented languages. The is...
BibTeX record
RIS record