CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Writing treatment for severe aphasia: Who benefits? Export

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, Vol. 46, No. 5. (2003), pp. 1038-1060.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


mebiel's tags for this article

agraphia aphasia_global aphasia_therapy july

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

mebiel has 0 private notes and 3 public notes for this article.

Source: Scopus

mebiel (public note) - 2009-06-27 02:33:20

Export Date: 26 June 2009

mebiel (public note) - 2009-06-27 02:33:20

Cited By (since 1996): 12

mebiel (public note) - 2009-06-27 02:33:20

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Writing treatment that involved repeated copying and recall of target words was implemented with 8 individuals with severe aphasia in order to discern the best candidates for the treatment. Four of the 8 participants had strong positive responses to the copy and recall treatment (CART), relearning spellings for 15 targeted words during 10 to 12 weeks of treatment and up to 5 additional words during a month-long homework-based program. Of the 4 other participants, 3 learned the spellings of some target words but failed to reach criterion, and 1 had a poor treatment outcome. Insights regarding possible factors that limited success were gained by examination of individual responses to treatment as well as performance on the pretreatment assessments of semantic, phonological, and orthographic processes. Among the factors associated with success were (a) consistent, accurate completion of daily homework, (b) a relatively preserved semantic system, (c) the ability to discern words from nonwords, and (d) adequately preserved nonverbal visual problem-solving skills. Aphasia severity and minimal pretreatment spelling abilities did not necessarily limit the response to treatment. Participants with positive treatment outcomes demonstrated improved spelling of target words following repeated copying within a single treatment session, and accurately completed daily writing homework. Thus, pretreatment assessment and stimulability within initial treatment sessions provided indications of likely outcome.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.