![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
mokgand's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
For and against: Public health does not need to be led by doctors For Against |
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Notes for this articleOpening paragraph :
Public health does not need to be led by doctors
For years lead positions in public health have been restricted to those with a medical background, and it is still impossible for individuals to be accredited as specialists in public health without medical training. But does such exclusivity have repercussions? Here a professor of epidemiology and two directors of public health present their views.
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
Abstract10.1136/bmj.322.7302.1593
BibTeX record
RIS record