Better late than never: how onsets and offsets influence prior entry and exit. Export

@article{citeulike:3874529, abstract = {The three experiments presented in the paper examine visual prior entry (determining which of two stimuli appeared first) and prior exit (determining which of two stimuli disappeared first) effects with a temporal order judgment (TOJ) task. In addition to using onset and offset targets, the preceding cues also consisted of either onset or offset stimuli. Typical, and equivalent, prior entry effects were found when either onset or offset cues preceded the onset targets. Unexpectedly large prior exit effects where found with the offset targets, with offset cues producing greater capture effects than onset cues. These findings are consistent with the notion that more attention is allocated to searching the visual field when targets are more difficult to find. In addition, the results indicate that attentional control settings may be more likely to occur with more difficult searches. In addition, these findings demonstrate that TOJ tasks provide extremely precise measures of the allocation of attention and are very sensitive to a range of task manipulations.}, author = {Vingilis-Jaremko, L. and Ferber, S. and Pratt, J.}, citeulike-article-id = {3874529}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-007-0120-8}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17647015}, citeulike-linkout-2 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=17647015}, doi = {10.1007/s00426-007-0120-8}, issn = {0340-0727}, journal = {Psychological research}, keywords = {capture, temporal}, month = {July}, number = {4}, pages = {443--450}, posted-at = {2009-01-11 17:28:27}, priority = {2}, title = {Better late than never: how onsets and offsets influence prior entry and exit.}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-007-0120-8}, volume = {72}, year = {2008} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:3874529 L3 - citeulike-article-id:3874529 N2 - The three experiments presented in the paper examine visual prior entry (determining which of two stimuli appeared first) and prior exit (determining which of two stimuli disappeared first) effects with a temporal order judgment (TOJ) task. In addition to using onset and offset targets, the preceding cues also consisted of either onset or offset stimuli. Typical, and equivalent, prior entry effects were found when either onset or offset cues preceded the onset targets. Unexpectedly large prior exit effects where found with the offset targets, with offset cues producing greater capture effects than onset cues. These findings are consistent with the notion that more attention is allocated to searching the visual field when targets are more difficult to find. In addition, the results indicate that attentional control settings may be more likely to occur with more difficult searches. In addition, these findings demonstrate that TOJ tasks provide extremely precise measures of the allocation of attention and are very sensitive to a range of task manipulations. IS - 4 JF - Psychological research SN - 0340-0727 EP - 450 TI - Better late than never: how onsets and offsets influence prior entry and exit. VL - 72 SP - 443 KW - capture KW - temporal AU - Vingilis-Jaremko, L AU - Ferber, S AU - Pratt, J PY - 2008/07// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-007-0120-8 ER -