Feature integration and spatial attention: common processes for endogenous and exogenous orienting Export

@article{citeulike:5333476, abstract = {Abstract\ \ Briand (J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:1243–1256, 1998) and Briand and Klein (J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13:228–241, 1987) demonstrated that spatial cueing effects are larger for detecting conjunction of features than for detecting simple features when spatial attention is oriented exogenously, and not when attention is oriented endogenously. Their results were interpreted as if only exogenous attention affects the posterior spatial attention system that performs the feature binding function attributed to spatial attention by Treisman's feature integration theory (FIT; 1980). In a series of 6 experiments, we attempted to replicate Briand's findings. Manipulations of distractor string size and symmetry of stimulus presentation left and right from fixation were implemented in Posner's cueing paradigm. The data indicate that both exogenous and endogenous cueing address the same attentional mechanism needed for feature binding. The results also limit the generalisability of Briand's proposal concerning the role of exogenous attention in feature integration. Furthermore, the importance to control the effect of unintended attentional capture in a cueing task is demonstrated.}, author = {Henderickx, David and Maetens, Kathleen and Soetens, Eric}, citeulike-article-id = {5333476}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-009-0251-1}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19639338}, citeulike-linkout-2 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=19639338}, citeulike-linkout-3 = {http://www.springerlink.com/content/325q7jnv72311w01}, day = {29}, doi = {10.1007/s00426-009-0251-1}, issn = {1430-2772}, journal = {Psychological Research}, keywords = {attention, capture}, month = {July}, posted-at = {2009-08-02 22:22:01}, priority = {5}, title = {Feature integration and spatial attention: common processes for endogenous and exogenous orienting}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-009-0251-1}, year = {2009} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:5333476 L3 - citeulike-article-id:5333476 N2 - Abstract  Briand (J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:1243–1256, 1998) and Briand and Klein (J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13:228–241, 1987) demonstrated that spatial cueing effects are larger for detecting conjunction of features than for detecting simple features when spatial attention is oriented exogenously, and not when attention is oriented endogenously. Their results were interpreted as if only exogenous attention affects the posterior spatial attention system that performs the feature binding function attributed to spatial attention by Treisman’s feature integration theory (FIT; 1980). In a series of 6 experiments, we attempted to replicate Briand’s findings. Manipulations of distractor string size and symmetry of stimulus presentation left and right from fixation were implemented in Posner’s cueing paradigm. The data indicate that both exogenous and endogenous cueing address the same attentional mechanism needed for feature binding. The results also limit the generalisability of Briand’s proposal concerning the role of exogenous attention in feature integration. Furthermore, the importance to control the effect of unintended attentional capture in a cueing task is demonstrated. JF - Psychological Research SN - 1430-2772 TI - Feature integration and spatial attention: common processes for endogenous and exogenous orienting KW - attention KW - capture AU - Henderickx, David AU - Maetens, Kathleen AU - Soetens, Eric PY - 2009/07/29/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-009-0251-1 ER -