Beyond quantity: Individual differences in working memory and the ordinal understanding of numerical symbols Export

@article{citeulike:5734588, abstract = {In two different contexts, we examined the hypothesis that individual differences in working memory (WM) capacity are related to the tendency to infer complex, ordinal relationships between numerical symbols. In Experiment 1, we assessed whether this tendency arises in a learning context that involves mapping novel symbols to quantities by training adult participants to associate dot-quantities with novel symbols, the overall relative order of which had to be inferred. Performance was best for participants who were higher in WM capacity (HWMs). HWMs also learned ordinal information about the symbols that lower WM individuals (LWMs) did not. In Experiment 2, we examined whether WM relates to performance when participants are explicitly instructed to make numerical order judgments about highly enculturated numerical symbols by having participants indicate whether sets of three Arabic numerals were in increasing order. All participants responded faster when sequential sets (3–4–5) were in order than when they were not. However, only HWMs responded faster when non-sequential, patterned sets (1–3–5) were in order, suggesting they were accessing ordinal associations that LWMs were not. Taken together, these experiments indicate that WM capacity plays a key role in extending symbolic number representations beyond their quantity referents to include symbol–symbol ordinal associations, both in a learning context and in terms of explicitly accessing ordinal relationships in highly enculturated stimuli.}, author = {Lyons, Ian M. and Beilock, Sian L.}, citeulike-article-id = {5734588}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.003}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010027709001875}, day = {03}, doi = {10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.003}, issn = {00100277}, journal = {Cognition}, keywords = {number, working\_memory}, month = {September}, posted-at = {2009-10-16 16:41:43}, priority = {2}, title = {Beyond quantity: Individual differences in working memory and the ordinal understanding of numerical symbols}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.003}, year = {2009} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:5734588 L3 - citeulike-article-id:5734588 N2 - In two different contexts, we examined the hypothesis that individual differences in working memory (WM) capacity are related to the tendency to infer complex, ordinal relationships between numerical symbols. In Experiment 1, we assessed whether this tendency arises in a learning context that involves mapping novel symbols to quantities by training adult participants to associate dot-quantities with novel symbols, the overall relative order of which had to be inferred. Performance was best for participants who were higher in WM capacity (HWMs). HWMs also learned ordinal information about the symbols that lower WM individuals (LWMs) did not. In Experiment 2, we examined whether WM relates to performance when participants are explicitly instructed to make numerical order judgments about highly enculturated numerical symbols by having participants indicate whether sets of three Arabic numerals were in increasing order. All participants responded faster when sequential sets (3–4–5) were in order than when they were not. However, only HWMs responded faster when non-sequential, patterned sets (1–3–5) were in order, suggesting they were accessing ordinal associations that LWMs were not. Taken together, these experiments indicate that WM capacity plays a key role in extending symbolic number representations beyond their quantity referents to include symbol–symbol ordinal associations, both in a learning context and in terms of explicitly accessing ordinal relationships in highly enculturated stimuli. JF - Cognition SN - 00100277 TI - Beyond quantity: Individual differences in working memory and the ordinal understanding of numerical symbols KW - number KW - working_memory AU - Lyons, Ian AU - Beilock, Sian PY - 2009/09/03/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.003 ER -