CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Are social inequalities in mortality in Britain narrowing? Time trends from 1978 to 2005 in a population-based study of older men Export

J Epidemiol Community Health, Vol. 62, No. 1. (1 January 2008), pp. 75-80.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


mpgrayer's tags for this article

british-heart-study chd health-inequalities mortality social-class uk

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

mpgrayer has 0 private notes and 1 public note for this article.

Study of health inequality trends in Britain between 1978 and 2005, using all-cause and CHD mortality as the outcome. Relative differences in mortality across occupation groups (manual and non-manual) have persisted and maybe increased, though absolute differences have been reduced as a result of mortality falling overall. This highlights the dilemma of choosing between relative and absolute measures.

mpgrayer (public note) - 2008-10-15 21:29:12

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

ObjectiveTo examine whether social inequalities in all-cause and coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality in Britain have reduced between 1978 and 2005. DesignA prospective study of a socioeconomically representative population. Setting24 British towns. Participants7735 Men, aged 40-59 years at recruitment in 1978-1980 and followed up until 2005 through the National Health Service Central Register (164 120 person-years). Main outcome measuresRelative hazards and absolute risk differences for all-cause and CHD death comparing manual with non-manual social classes, calculated for different calendar periods. Results3009 Deaths from all causes (1003 from CHD) occurred during follow-up. The overall hazard ratio (manual versus non-manual) was 1.56 (95% CI 1.45 to 1.69, p<0.001) for all-cause mortality and 1.54 (95% CI 1.35 to 1.76, p<0.001) for CHD mortality. The relative difference between these social groups tended to increase over time. The overall relative increase in hazard ratio comparing manual with non-manual groups over a 20-year calendar period was 1.22 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.80, p = 0.31) for all-cause mortality and 1.75 (95% CI 0.89 to 3.45, p = 0.11) for CHD mortality. The absolute difference in probability of survival to age 65 years between non-manual and manual groups fell from 29% in 1981 to 19% in 2001 for all-cause mortality and from 17% to 7% for CHD mortality. ConclusionRelative differences in all-cause and CHD mortality between manual and non-manual social class groups persisted and may have increased during this period. Absolute differences in mortality between these social groups decreased as a result of falling overall mortality rates. Greater effort is needed to reduce social inequalities in all-cause and CHD mortality in the new millennium. 10.1136/jech.2006.053207


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.