CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software Export

In CHI '02: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (2002), pp. 164-170.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


neilernst's tags for this article

adaptation cognition customization

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

neilernst has 0 private notes and 1 public note for this article.
  • distinction between adaptable (by the user) and adaptive (by the program) software.
neilernst (public note) - 2005-04-13 14:41:05

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

This study examines a novel interface design for heavily-featured productivity software. The design includes two interfaces between which the user can easily toggle: (1) an interface personalized by the user containing desired features only, and (2) the default interface with all the standard features. This design was prototyped as a front-end to a commercial word processor and evaluated in a comprehensive field study. The study tested the effects of different interface designs on users' satisfaction and their perceived ability to navigate, control, and learn the software. There were two conditions: a commercial word processor with adaptive menus and our two-interface prototype with adaptable menus for the same word processor. Results showed that participants were better able to navigate through the menus and toolbars and were better able to learn with our prototype. There were also significant differences in satisfaction and control with our design


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.