CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Factors influencing the identification of transcription factor binding sites by cross-species comparison. Export

Genome Res, Vol. 12, No. 10. (October 2002), pp. 1523-1532.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


nklee's tags for this article

cross-species

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

As the number of sequenced genomes has grown, the questions of which species are most useful and how many genomes are sufficient for comparison have become increasingly important for comparative genomics studies. We have systematically addressed these questions with respect to phylogenetic footprinting of transcription factor (TF) binding sites in the gamma-proteobacteria, and have evaluated the statistical significance of our motif predictions. We used a study set of 166 Escherichia coli genes that have experimentally identified TF binding sites upstream of the gene, with orthologous data from nine additional gamma-proteobacteria for phylogenetic footprinting. Just three species were sufficient for approximately 74.0% of the motif predictions to correspond to the experimentally reported E. coli sites, and important characteristics to consider when choosing species were phylogenetic distance, genome size, and natural habitat. We also performed simulations using randomized data to determine the critical maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) values for statistical significance of our motif predictions (P = 0.05). Approximately 60% of motif predictions containing sites from just three species had average MAP values above these critical MAP values. The inclusion of a species very closely related to E. coli increased the number of statistically significant motif predictions, despite substantially increasing the critical MAP value.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.