CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Global consequences of interactions between clouds and radiation at scales unresolved by global climate models Export

Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 32 (16 March 2005), L06703.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


nurban's tags for this article

bias climate cloud gcm model radiative-forcing superparameterization

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Horizontal grid-spacings in conventional atmospheric general circulation models (GCMs) are typically between 100 km and 500 km. Hence, many processes are unresolved and must be parameterized in terms of resolved variables. Development of satisfactory parameterizations of mean-field (or domain-average) cloud and radiative processes has been frustratingly slow. Moreover, the sensitivity of conventional GCMs to unresolved interactions between cloud and radiation is unknown. In this study, the native cloud parameterization of a GCM was replaced, in each GCM grid column, by a two-dimensional cloud system-resolving model (CSRM). The CSRMs used a horizontal grid-spacing of 4 km. They were employed to assess the sensitivity of a GCM to the inclusion of interactions between cloud and radiation at unresolved scales as well as sensitivity to accurate domain-average radiative flux profiles. For a simulation spanning one season, unresolved cloud-radiation interactions affect the statistics of average cloud fraction and average cloud-radiative effect, while the accuracy of domain-average radiative flux profiles had less effect.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.