Proactive and retroactive effects of negative suggestion. Export

@article{citeulike:1154350, abstract = {The negative effects of false information presented either prior to (proactive interference; PI) or following (retroactive interference; RI) true information was examined with word definitions (Experiment 1) and trivia facts (Experiment 2). Participants were explicitly aware of which information was true and false when shown, and true-false discrimination was evaluated via multiple-choice tests. Negative suggestion, defined as poorer performance on interference items than noninterference (control) items, consistently occurred when the wrong information followed the correct information (RI) but not when it preceded the correct information (PI). These effects did not change as a function of retention interval (immediate, 1 week, or 3 weeks) or number of incorrect alternatives (1 or 3). Implications of this outcome for experiencing incorrect information in both academic and nonacademic situations are considered.}, address = {Department of Psychology, Dedman College, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275, USA. abrown@smu.edu}, author = {Brown, A. S. and Brown, C. M. and Mosbacher, J. L. and Dryden, W. E.}, citeulike-article-id = {1154350}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1234}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17087580}, citeulike-linkout-2 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=17087580}, doi = {10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1234}, issn = {0278-7393}, journal = {J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn}, keywords = {falsity, information, suggestion}, month = {November}, number = {6}, pages = {1234--1243}, posted-at = {2007-03-11 19:24:08}, priority = {4}, title = {Proactive and retroactive effects of negative suggestion.}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1234}, volume = {32}, year = {2006} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:1154350 L3 - citeulike-article-id:1154350 N2 - The negative effects of false information presented either prior to (proactive interference; PI) or following (retroactive interference; RI) true information was examined with word definitions (Experiment 1) and trivia facts (Experiment 2). Participants were explicitly aware of which information was true and false when shown, and true-false discrimination was evaluated via multiple-choice tests. Negative suggestion, defined as poorer performance on interference items than noninterference (control) items, consistently occurred when the wrong information followed the correct information (RI) but not when it preceded the correct information (PI). These effects did not change as a function of retention interval (immediate, 1 week, or 3 weeks) or number of incorrect alternatives (1 or 3). Implications of this outcome for experiencing incorrect information in both academic and nonacademic situations are considered. IS - 6 JF - J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn SN - 0278-7393 AD - Department of Psychology, Dedman College, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275, USA. abrown@smu.edu EP - 1243 TI - Proactive and retroactive effects of negative suggestion. VL - 32 SP - 1234 KW - falsity KW - information KW - suggestion AU - Brown, AS AU - Brown, CM AU - Mosbacher, JL AU - Dryden, WE PY - 2006/11// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1234 ER -