CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Origin of Primate Orphan Genes: A Comparative Genomics Approach Export

Mol Biol Evol, Vol. 26, No. 3. (1 March 2009), pp. 603-612.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


operon's tags for this article

evolution genomics rearrangements

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Genomes contain a large number of genes that do not have recognizable homologues in other species and that are likely to be involved in important species-specific adaptive processes. The origin of many such "orphan" genes remains unknown. Here we present the first systematic study of the characteristics and mechanisms of formation of primate-specific orphan genes. We determine that codon usage values for most orphan genes fall within the bulk of the codon usage distribution of bona fide human proteins, supporting their current protein-coding annotation. We also show that primate orphan genes display distinctive features in relation to genes of wider phylogenetic distribution: higher tissue specificity, more rapid evolution, and shorter peptide size. We estimate that around 24% are highly divergent members of mammalian protein families. Interestingly, around 53% of the orphan genes contain sequences derived from transposable elements (TEs) and are mostly located in primate-specific genomic regions. This indicates frequent recruitment of TEs as part of novel genes. Finally, we also obtain evidence that a small fraction of primate orphan genes, around 5.5%, might have originated de novo from mammalian noncoding genomic regions. 10.1093/molbev/msn281


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.