CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Successes and failures in modular genetic engineering

by: Joshua T. Kittleson, Gabriel C. Wu, J. Christopher Anderson
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, Vol. 16, No. 3-4. (August 2012), pp. 329-336, doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.06.009  Key: citeulike:10916647

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

Synthetic biology relies on engineering concepts such as abstraction, standardization, and decoupling to develop systems that address environmental, clinical, and industrial needs. Recent advances in applying modular design to system development have enabled creation of increasingly complex systems. However, several challenges to module and system development remain, including syntactic errors, semantic errors, parameter mismatches, contextual sensitivity, noise and evolution, and load and stress. To combat these challenges, researchers should develop a framework for describing and reasoning about biological information, design systems with modularity in mind, and investigate how to predictively describe the diverse sources and consequences of metabolic load and stress. ⺠Modular design of genetic devices enables design of increasingly complex systems. ⺠Development of modules and systems is hindered by several failure modes. ⺠Codification of biological information will facilitate computer aided design. ⺠Novel designs should explicitly consider modularity during engineering efforts.


pablocarb's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.