CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Rotating light, the orbital angular momentum paradox and relativistic complex scalar fields Export

Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics, Vol. 11, No. 6. (2009), 065701.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


pak's tags for this article

angular em momentum physics relativity spin

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Recent studies show that the angular momentum, both spin and orbital, of rotating light beams possesses counter-intuitive characteristics. We present a new approach to the question of the orbital angular momentum of light based on the complex massless scalar field representation of light. The covariant equation for the scalar field is treated in a rotating system using the general relativistic framework. The equivalence of the U(1) gauge current for the scalar field with the Poynting vector continuity equation for paraxial light is used to apply the formalism to the calculation of the orbital angular momentum of rotating light beams. If the difference between the co-, contra- and physical quantities is properly accounted for there is no paradox in the orbital angular momentum of rotating light. An artificial analogue of the paradoxical situation could be constructed but it is wrong within the present formalism. It is shown that the orbital angular momentum of a rotating beam comprising modes with opposite azimuthal indices corresponds to that of rigid rotation. A plausible physical explanation of this feature is suggested in analogy with the rigid rotation of the vortex core in a rotating fluid.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.