CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Performance of the Firefly RPC Export

ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., Vol. 8, No. 1. (1990), pp. 1-17.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


pedagand's tags for this article

bulk-data-transport inter-process-communication lecture-aos operating-system remote-procedure-calls

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

In this paper we report on the performance of the remote procedure call (RPC) implementation for the Firefly multiprocessor and analyze the implementation to account precisely for all measured latency. From the analysis and measurements, we estimate how much faster RPC could be if certain improvements were made. The elapsed time for an intermachine call to a remote procedure that accepts no arguments and produces no results is 2.66 ms. The elapsed time for an RPC that has a single 1440-byte result (the maximum result that will fit in a single packet) is 6.35 ms. Maximum intermachine throughput of application program data using RPC is 4.65 Mbits/s, achieved with four threads making parallel RPCs that return the maximum-size result that fits in a single RPC result packet. CPU utilization at maximum throughput is about 1.2 CPU seconds per second on the calling machine and a little less on the server. These measurements are for RPCs from user space on one machine to user space on another, using the installed system and a 10 Mbit/s Ethernet. The RPC packet exchange protocol is built on IP/UDP, and the times include calculating and verifying UDP checksums. The Fireflies used in the tests had 5 MicroVAX II processors and a DEQNA Ethernet controller.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.