CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Collective Choice in Virtual Teams

by: Alois Ferscha, Christoph Scheiner
In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Enabling Technologies on Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (1999), pp. 96-101  Key: citeulike:12030317

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

Virtual organizations within and across enterprise structures are becoming mature as a potentially effective means for goal oriented business teamwork. Among the plentiful of support functions enabling the efficient cooperation in teams, team decision making is a very crucial one, but does not find adequate support in contemporary team software solutions. Even the most knowledgeable results from collective choice theory are not reflected in the respective virtual team environments.This paper makes a first and very systematic attempt to provide virtual teams with the power of voting procedures developed in the context of the theory of collective choice. A toolset, TEAMVOTE, for electronic decision making is presented, implementing a blend of the most important collective choice strategies like the Dodgson rule, the majority rule, plurality voting, Borda counting, approval voting, the Nanson rule, the Hare rule, the Coomb rule etc. based on standard Internet technology. The services of TEAMVOTE targeted to support goal oriented business teams in group decision matters raises the perspective of its use also to enable democratic processes on a societal scale.


perikles's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.