![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
plaugg's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Improving system dependability by enforcing architectural intentIn WADS '05: Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on Architecting dependable systems (2005), pp. 1-7.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractDeveloping dependable software systems. requires enforcing conformance between architecture and implementation during software development and evolution. We address this problem with a multi-pronged approach: (a) automated refinement of a component-and-connector (C&C;) architectural view into an initial implementation, (b) enforcement of architectural structure at the programming language level, (c) automated abstraction of a C&C; view from an implementation, and (d) semi-automated incremental synchronization between the architectural and the implementation C&C; views.We use an Architecture Description Language (ADL), Acme, to describe the architecture, and ArchJava, an implementation language which embeds a C&C; architecture specification within Java implementation code. Although both Acme and ArchJava specify C&C; views, a number of structural differences may arise. Our approach can detect structural differences which correspond directly to implementation-level violations of the well thoughtout architectural intent. Furthermore, supplementing the C&C; view extracted from the implementation with architectural types and styles can uncover additional violations.
BibTeX record
RIS record