Representing concerns in source code

@article{robillard07:concerns, abstract = {A software modification task often addresses several concerns. A concern is anything a stakeholder may want to consider as a conceptual unit, including features, nonfunctional requirements, and design idioms. In many cases, the source code implementing a concern is not encapsulated in a single programming language module, and is instead scattered and tangled throughout a system. Inadequate separation of concerns increases the difficulty of evolving software in a correct and cost-effective manner. To make it easier to modify concerns that are not well modularized, we propose an approach in which the implementation of concerns is documented in artifacts, called concern graphs. Concern graphs are abstract models that describe which parts of the source code are relevant to different concerns. We present a formal model for concern graphs and the tool support we developed to enable software developers to create and use concern graphs during software evolution tasks. We report on five empirical studies, providing evidence that concern graphs support views and operations that facilitate the task of modifying the code implementing scattered concerns, are cost-effective to create and use, and robust enough to be used with different versions of a software system.}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, author = {Robillard, Martin P. and Murphy, Gail C. }, citeulike-article-id = {1118654}, doi = {10.1145/1189748.1189751}, journal = {ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol.}, month = {February}, number = {1}, posted-at = {2007-02-26 14:24:07}, priority = {0}, publisher = {ACM Press}, title = {Representing concerns in source code}, url = {http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1189748.1189751}, volume = {16}, year = {2007} }

TY - JOUR ID - robillard07:concerns L3 - citeulike-article-id:1118654 TI - Representing concerns in source code JF - ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. VL - 16 IS - 1 AD - New York, NY, USA PB - ACM Press N2 - A software modification task often addresses several concerns. A concern is anything a stakeholder may want to consider as a conceptual unit, including features, nonfunctional requirements, and design idioms. In many cases, the source code implementing a concern is not encapsulated in a single programming language module, and is instead scattered and tangled throughout a system. Inadequate separation of concerns increases the difficulty of evolving software in a correct and cost-effective manner. To make it easier to modify concerns that are not well modularized, we propose an approach in which the implementation of concerns is documented in artifacts, called concern graphs. Concern graphs are abstract models that describe which parts of the source code are relevant to different concerns. We present a formal model for concern graphs and the tool support we developed to enable software developers to create and use concern graphs during software evolution tasks. We report on five empirical studies, providing evidence that concern graphs support views and operations that facilitate the task of modifying the code implementing scattered concerns, are cost-effective to create and use, and robust enough to be used with different versions of a software system. AU - Robillard, Martin AU - Murphy, Gail PY - 2007/02// UR - http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1189748.1189751 ER -