![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
plonsdale's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
To construct optimal training set for video annotationIn MULTIMEDIA '06: Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia (2006), pp. 89-92.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractThis paper exploits the criteria to optimize the training set construction for video annotation. Most existing learning-based semantic annotation approaches require a large training set to achieve good generalization capacity, in which a considerable amount of labor-intensively manual labeling is desirable. However, it is observed that the generalization capacity of a classifier highly depends on the geometrical distribution rather than the size of the training data. We argue that a training set which includes most temporal and spatial distribution of the whole data will achieve a satisfying performance even in the case of limited size of training set. In order to capture the geometrical distribution characteristics of a given video collection, we propose the following four metrics for constructing an optimal training set, including Salience Time Dispersiveness Spatial Dispersiveness and Diversity . Moreover, based on these metrics, we propose a set of optimization rules to capture the most distribution information of the whole data for a training set with a given size. Experimental results demonstrate that these rules are effective for training set construction for video annotation, and significantly outperform random training set selection as well.
BibTeX record
RIS record