CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Early-universe constraints on dark energy

by: Rachel Bean, Steen Hansen, Alessandro Melchiorri
Physical Review D, Vol. 64, No. 10. (28 October 2001), doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.103508  Key: citeulike:9565972

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

In the past years 'quintessence' models have been considered which can produce the accelerated expansion in the universe suggested by recent astronomical observations. One of the key differences between quintessence and a cosmological constant is that the energy density in quintessence, $Ω_φ$, could be a significant fraction of the overall energy even in the early universe, while the cosmological constant will be dynamically relevant only at late times. We use standard Big Bang Nucleosynthesis and the observed abundances of primordial nuclides to put constraints on $Ω_φ$ at temperatures near $T ∼ 1MeV$. We point out that current experimental data does not support the presence of such a field, providing the strong constraint $Ω_φ(MeV) < 0.045$ at $2σ$ C.L. and strengthening previous results. We also consider the effect a scaling field has on CMB anisotropies using the recent data from Boomerang and DASI, providing the CMB constraint $Ω_φ ≤ 0.39$ at $2σ$ during the radiation dominated epoch.


ppxet's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.